Day 239 – Did You Take Your Vitamin-D Today?

by The Philosophical Fish

Day 239 - Did You Take Your Vitamin-D Today?

239/365 (August 27, 2010) – Vitamin-D has a pretty cool biological history. It played a critical role in the maintenance of a calcified skeleton in vertebrates as they left their calcium-rich ocean environment for land over 350 million years ago. Because it can only be synthesized via a photochemical process, early vertebrates that ventured onto land either had to ingest foods that contained Vitamin-D or had to be exposed to sunlight to photosynthesize it in their skin to satisfy their body’s vitamin D requirement.

In recent years various studies have linked low levels of Vitamin-D with a number of health issues from cancer to heart disease.

In a nutshell, it is an important vitamin and one worth popping on a daily basis.

10 comments

Flickr: David on LRM August 28, 2010 - 6:52 am

Do the pills work without the sunshine???

David in Derbyshire August 28, 2010 - 6:52 am

Do the pills work without the sunshine???

Flickr: Free 2 Be August 28, 2010 - 4:08 pm

Yes, that’s the point, we often don’t get enough sunshine (particularly in Northern climes like ours and yours) to synthesize enough Vitamin-D for our needs, so supplements have been shown to be very valuable.

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/05/16/f-health-vitamin-d.html

Free 2 Be August 28, 2010 - 4:08 pm

Yes, that’s the point, we often don’t get enough sunshine (particularly in Northern climes like ours and yours) to synthesize enough Vitamin-D for our needs, so supplements have been shown to be very valuable.

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/05/16/f-health-vitamin-d.html

Flickr: David on LRM August 28, 2010 - 9:56 pm

Hey – I don’t need telling twice – off to the health food shop pronto!

David in Derbyshire August 28, 2010 - 9:56 pm

Hey – I don’t need telling twice – off to the health food shop pronto!

Flickr: David on LRM August 28, 2010 - 10:02 pm

Ah but wait a minute . . . "The study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, found that a higher level of vitamin D in men is not associated with a lower risk of developing prostate cancer. And in some cases, it may be linked to a higher risk of developing a more aggressive form of the disease.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/05/16/f-health-vitamin-d.htm...

Curses!

🙂

David in Derbyshire August 28, 2010 - 10:02 pm

Ah but wait a minute . . . "The study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, found that a higher level of vitamin D in men is not associated with a lower risk of developing prostate cancer. And in some cases, it may be linked to a higher risk of developing a more aggressive form of the disease.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/05/16/f-health-vitamin-d.htm...

Curses!

🙂

Flickr: Free 2 Be August 29, 2010 - 3:09 pm

There isn’t ever a clear answer in science, and even the same study can result in conflicting evidence. I think whenever there is a pre-existing condition…one should always talk to one’s doctor. Better to be safe.

Free 2 Be August 29, 2010 - 3:09 pm

There isn’t ever a clear answer in science, and even the same study can result in conflicting evidence. I think whenever there is a pre-existing condition…one should always talk to one’s doctor. Better to be safe.

Comments are closed.